Idea
Having a team based and individual candidacy both options for the SU Election
Category: Assessment and Feedback
Voting closed
This is to state that along with the existing individual candidacy option, a team based candidacy option for the SU Election will also be a good option where the team consists of at least 4 candidates and each candidates will stand for each positions maximising the potentiality of reaching out to maximum students as the team members can express about their desire to make changes in the campus. It shall also showcase the team work of the candidates which is necessary to make student life better.
For this reason, I am suggesting to have individual candidacy and team based candidacy both options for the SU Election.
Don't hesitate to suggest your opinion regarding this idea.
Comments
I don't think this makes sense. Are you suggesting that we elect another 4 officers or are you saying that our current officers should do all 4 roles. If you are wanting to elect 4 new officers, will they be doing all four roles? Where would you put the new officers. If you're saying the current officers should do all 4 roles, wouldn't this get confusing. I think they are a team how they are and work well together while having specific roles. What is wrong with the set up we have now with the 4 roles. This is very confusing.
would this not lead to teams bullying people into voting. i think this would just turn hostile. i dont think this is good idea at all